Twenty-four month results from a randomized trial of cyanoacrylate closure versus radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of incompetent great saphenous veins.

OBJECTIVE: We previously reported 3-month and 12-month occlusion rates after treatment of clinically symptomatic saphenous vein reflux with either cyanoacrylate closure (CAC) using the VenaSeal Closure System (Medtronic, Dublin, Ireland) or radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in a randomized, multicenter, clinical trial, VenaSeal Sapheon Closure System vs Radiofrequency Ablation for Incompetent Great Saphenous Veins (VeClose). Herein we report the 24-month follow-up results of the VeClose trial. METHODS: There were 222 patients with symptomatic great saphenous vein (GSV) incompetence who were randomly assigned to receive either CAC (n = 108) or RFA (n = 114). Patients were not allowed to receive adjunctive treatment of tributary varicosities until after the 3-month visit. Duplex ultrasound of the target vein was performed at day 3 and months 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 after treatment, and closure was assessed by ultrasound by the treating physician. Overall 24-month success rates were compared; in addition, time to first reopening of the target vein was evaluated using survival analysis. End points such as Venous Clinical Severity Score, EuroQoL-5 Dimension, and Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire were evaluated. RESULTS: Of 222 randomized patients, 171 completed the 24-month follow-up, which included 87 from the CAC group and 84 from the RFA group. The 24-month complete closure rate was 95.3% in the CAC group and 94.0% in the RFA group, demonstrating continued noninferiority of CAC compared with RFA (P = .0034). Symptoms and quality of life improved similarly in both groups. No clinically significant device- or procedure-related late adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Both CAC and RFA were effective in closure of the target GSV, resulting in similar and significant improvements in the patient's quality of life through 24 months. These results suggest that CAC of the GSV is safe and durable out to 2 years.

VeClose trial 12-month outcomes of cyanoacrylate closure versus radiofrequency ablation for incompetent great saphenous veins.

OBJECTIVE: Endovenous cyanoacrylate closure (CAC) is a new U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved therapy for treatment of clinically symptomatic venous reflux in saphenous veins. The device is indicated for the permanent closure of lower extremity superficial truncal veins, such as the great saphenous vein (GSV). Early results from a randomized trial of CAC have been reported previously. Herein we report 1-year outcomes. METHODS: There were 222 subjects with symptomatic GSV incompetence randomly assigned to receive either CAC (n = 108) or radiofrequency ablation (RFA; n = 114). After the month 3 visit, subjects could receive adjunctive therapies aimed at treating visible varicosities and incompetent tributaries. Vein closure was assessed at day 3 and months 1, 3, 6, and 12 using duplex ultrasound. Additional study visit assessments included the Venous Clinical Severity Score; Clinical, Etiology, Anatomy, and Pathophysiology classification; EuroQol-5 Dimension; and Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire. Both time to closure and time to first reopening of the target vein were evaluated using survival curve analysis. Adverse events were evaluated at each visit. RESULTS: Of 222 enrolled and randomized subjects, a 12-month follow-up was obtained for 192 (95 CAC and 97 RFA; total follow-up rate, 192/222 [86.5%]). By month 1, 100% of CAC subjects and 87% of RFA subjects demonstrated complete occlusion of the target vein. By month 12, the complete occlusion rate was nearly identical in both groups (97.2% in the CAC group and 97.0% in the RFA group). Twelve-month freedom from recanalization was similar in the CAC and RFA groups, although there was a trend toward greater freedom from recanalization in the CAC group (P = .08). Symptoms and quality of life improved equally in both groups. Most adverse events were mild to moderate and not related to the device or procedure. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with incompetent GSVs, treatment with both CAC and RFA results in high occlusion rates. Time to complete occlusion was faster with CAC, and freedom from reopening was higher after CAC. Quality of life scores improved equally with both therapies.

Roll-in phase analysis of clinical study of cyanoacrylate closure for incompetent great saphenous veins.

OBJECTIVE: Cyanoacrylate closure (CAC) was shown in the recently published VenaSeal Sapheon Closure System vs Radiofrequency Ablation for Incompetent Great Saphenous Veins (VeClose) randomized clinical study to be an effective and noninferior option (in terms of both safety and effectiveness) to radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in the treatment of incompetent great saphenous veins. The objectives of this analysis were to report the efficacy and safety outcomes of the VeClose roll-in (training) group treated with CAC by physicians who had received device use training but had no prior treatment experience with the technique and to compare the outcomes with those from the randomized RFA and CAC groups. METHODS: The first two subjects at each participating site (n = 20) were roll-in cases (ie, not randomized but instead treated with CAC) to ensure the physician's familiarity with the procedure. Subsequent eligible subjects were randomized to either CAC or RFA. After treatment, all subjects returned for assessment on day 3 and months 1, 3, 6, and 12. The study's primary end point was complete closure of the target vein at month 3. Secondary analyses included patient-reported intraprocedural pain and investigator-rated ecchymosis at day 3. Additional assessments included procedure time, quality of life surveys, and adverse events. RESULTS: Mean procedure time was longer in the roll-in group (31 minutes) compared with the randomized groups (24 minutes for CAC and 19 minutes for RFA; P < .0001). Procedure time decreased in both the CAC and RFA groups over time, plateauing at about 22 minutes for CAC and 15 minutes for RFA. In the roll-in group, the 3-month complete occlusion rate was 100%. Reported intraprocedural pain ratings were similar between the roll-in and randomized groups. Other clinical assessments, including quality of life improvement and adverse events, were similar between the roll-in and randomized groups. Increasing procedure number did not affect clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The results from the VeClose study roll-in group demonstrate that despite the physician's lack of prior experience, initial treatment with CAC leads to comparable efficacy and safety results to RFA and is associated with a relatively short learning period.

Novel vein closure procedure using a proprietary cyanoacrylate adhesive: 30-day swine model results.

PURPOSE: To conduct a pilot study to demonstrate a novel method of using a proprietary cyanoacrylate (CA) for closure of superficial veins. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Right and left superficial epigastric veins from two swine models were utilized due to the vein's similarities with the human great saphenous vein. Under ultrasound guidance, access was gained and a 5-F delivery catheter was advanced to the junction of the superficial epigastric and abdominus rectus veins. A dispenser gun was then utilized to inject 0.16 mL of CA while compression was applied cephalad to the end of the catheter. Immediately after delivery, the catheter was pulled back 3 cm and manual compression was employed for 30 seconds. After this first injection, the ultrasound probe was repositioned caudad to the injection and cephalad to the catheter tip and another 0.16 mL injection was delivered with immediate 3 cm pullback of the delivery system. Manual compression was applied at the caudad end of the treated vein for 30 seconds. This process was repeated until the entire target segment was treated. RESULTS: At 30 days postimplantation, the treated veins were occluded with no evidence of recanalization or migration. Histological findings revealed that the lumen was dilated by coalescing, arborizing clear spaces with entrapped lytic erythrocytes, demarcated by a thin band of granular eosinophilic material. Spindle cells with dense eosinophilic matrix replaced the tunica intima and disrupted the tunica media. CONCLUSION: Results of this initial study demonstrated that intravascular injection of CA is feasible for closure of superficial veins in animal models. These findings warrant further animal studies of this proprietary CA to assess efficacy, safety and its effects on perivenous structures.

Cyanoacrylate adhesive for the closure of truncal veins: 60-day swine model results.

BACKGROUND: The introduction of cyanoacrylate (CA) within a blood vessel triggers polymerization, followed by an inflammatory reaction. METHODS: A sheath was positioned 2.0 cm caudad to the junction of the superficial epigastric and abdominus rectus veins in 2 swine, followed by ultrasound-guided injection of 0.16 mL of CA glue. After glue delivery, the catheter was pulled back 3 cm, compression was applied to the treatment site, and the process was repeated for the entire length. At 60 days postimplantation, the veins were harvested surgically and examined histologically. RESULTS: The histologic changes were consistent with a chronic foreign-body-type inflammatory response. Venous closure, segmental wall thickening, and fibrosis were observed. CONCLUSION: Injection of CA is feasible for closure of superficial veins in animal models. Vein closure is achieved via an inflammatory process which ultimately leads to fibrosis.